{"created":"2024-06-13T04:50:57.222124+00:00","id":2001167,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"4ef7356b-6212-4c0c-bee9-d3dde39517f1"},"_deposit":{"created_by":17,"id":"2001167","owner":"17","owners":[17],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2001167"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:aichiu.repo.nii.ac.jp:02001167","sets":["641:643:1718251580701"]},"author_link":[],"item_10002_alternative_title_1":{"attribute_name":"その他（別言語等）のタイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_alternative_title":"About Two Types of Subjunctive Past","subitem_alternative_title_language":"en"}]},"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2021-12-21","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"44","bibliographicPageEnd":"26","bibliographicPageStart":"15","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"愛知大学短期大学部研究論集","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"}]}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"多くの参考書では，仮定法過去の文は2 種類あることは認めているが，その見分け方についての言及まではない．その見分け方としては，Declerck（1991）によれば，仮定法過去の文が「反事実」を表す場合は，if 節内に状態を表す動詞が使用される一方で，「未来におけるわずかな可能性」を表す場合はif 節内に動作を表す動詞が使用されるというものがある．この基準は2 種類の仮定法過去の文を見分ける簡単な方法であるが，本稿では新たな基準を紹介したい．それは，仮定法過去の文が「反事実」を表す場合は，if 節内でshouldを使用することができるが，were to で言いかえることはできず，仮定法過去の文が「未来におけるわずかな可能性」を表すのであれば，それはwere to かshould でいいかえることができるというものである","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"},{"subitem_description":"According to some English grammar books for students,there are clearly two types of subjunctive past sentences, butwe cannot find any explanations about how to tell one typeof subjunctive past sentence from the other type in them.Declerck（1991） says that if a subjunctive past sentencemeans counterfactual, the verb used in the ‘if’ clause is active,while a subjunctive past sentence means little possibilityfor future, the verb seen in the ‘if’ clause is stative. This isan easy way to distinguish two types of subjunctive pastsentences. In addition, in my view, if a subjunctive pastsentence means counterfactual, the subordinating clause isparaphrased by using ‘should,’ while when a subjunctive pastsentence means little possibility for future, the subordinatingclause can be paraphrased using ‘were to’ or ‘should.’ Thisis a new way to differentiate two types of subjunctive pastsentences.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"愛知大学短期大学部","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"}]},"item_10002_source_id_11":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00007903","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"02879220","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"梅田,泰","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"UMEDA,Yasushi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"familyNames":[{"familyName":"梅田","familyNameLang":"ja"},{"familyName":"UMEDA","familyNameLang":"en"}],"givenNames":[{"givenName":"泰","givenNameLang":"ja"},{"givenName":"Yasushi","givenNameLang":"en"}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2024-06-13"}],"filename":"02梅田泰氏.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"671 KB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_5","url":{"url":"https://aichiu.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2001167/files/02梅田泰氏.pdf"},"version_id":"b3549ff1-7912-442e-8776-00f738c0106e"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"仮定法過去","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"反事実","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"反実仮想","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"単なる仮定","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"未来における 可能性の低い可能性","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"were to，should","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"2つの仮定法過去の文について","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"2つの仮定法過去の文について","subitem_title_language":"ja"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"17","path":["1718251580701"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2024-06-13"},"publish_date":"2024-06-13","publish_status":"0","recid":"2001167","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["2つの仮定法過去の文について"],"weko_creator_id":"17","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-06-17T00:41:52.129053+00:00"}